<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triumph &#8211; but what model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/triumph-but-what-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/triumph-but-what-model/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=triumph-but-what-model</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx England</title>
		<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/triumph-but-what-model/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxx England]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/?p=9233#comment-1873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Val Page designed Tiger I think.  Looks too small a barrel for a Tiger 70 (250), so I hazard a guess at it being either Tiger 80 (350) or 90 (500).  The 350s were popular in off road racing, but the 500 never seemed to go as well in it&#039;s class, according to a Triumph history I read somewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Val Page designed Tiger I think.  Looks too small a barrel for a Tiger 70 (250), so I hazard a guess at it being either Tiger 80 (350) or 90 (500).  The 350s were popular in off road racing, but the 500 never seemed to go as well in it&#8217;s class, according to a Triumph history I read somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
