<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1966 Triumph T100C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/1966-triumph-t100c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/1966-triumph-t100c/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=1966-triumph-t100c</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-6759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the Unit-construction version of the T100C, Alan.
Although I prefer the Pre-unit models, this is a genuine and still great 500 and T100C is the correct denomination.

The &#039;clocks&#039; on this one looks younger, When I recall correctly, the &#039;66 ones still did not have the rubber enclosed ones?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the Unit-construction version of the T100C, Alan.<br />
Although I prefer the Pre-unit models, this is a genuine and still great 500 and T100C is the correct denomination.</p>
<p>The &#8216;clocks&#8217; on this one looks younger, When I recall correctly, the &#8217;66 ones still did not have the rubber enclosed ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alan hughes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-2499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not a genuine T100C, They were only built in 1953 and had all Ally engine, twin amals with a shared float chamber and a sprung hub!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a genuine T100C, They were only built in 1953 and had all Ally engine, twin amals with a shared float chamber and a sprung hub!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/pictures/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 04:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vintagebike.co.uk/1966-triumph-t100c/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi from Nashville...
I really like your bike...I just inherited 4 boxs. of a T-100 ...any info on parts etc would be appreciated...
Thanks,
Phil in Nashphil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi from Nashville&#8230;<br />
I really like your bike&#8230;I just inherited 4 boxs. of a T-100 &#8230;any info on parts etc would be appreciated&#8230;<br />
Thanks,<br />
Phil in Nashphil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
